American Madness

Intelligent Criticism in the Service of a Better Nation




Movie Review: Whatever Works

Posted by Jason Ihle | 6 Comments

Woody Allen has worked tirelessly in the last 30 some odd years turning out a new film every year like clockwork. His great period was from the late 70’s into the mid 80’s when he made such classics as Annie Hall, Manhattan, and Radio Days. Through the 90’s he managed to maintain a steady stream of well-written, sharply funny films achieving greatness once again with Deconstructing Harry in 1998. Since then he’s had a series of mostly forgettable films ranging from the atrocious The Curse of the Jade Scorpion to the mediocre Melinda and Melinda.

Finally, after four European-set films and a long absence from the New York that he knows so well, he has returned to that familiar territory in Whatever Works, in which Larry David plays Boris Yelnikoff (What a name!). The character is the typical Allen alter-ego – a neurotic, self-obsessed, sarcastic, caustic middle-aged man who thinks he has a better grasp on philosophy and life than anyone else around him (or the women around him anyway).

The funny thing is that I immediately recognized Boris as an archetypal Woody Allen character, with his philosophical views, late-night panic attacks about death and morose view of humanity, but in thinking about it later I could scarcely come up with previous Allen characters who exhibit the same tendencies in the same way. Thankfully Larry David strikes the right balance in his performance. For an actor who plays a character with no redeeming qualities and whom I absolutely despise on “Curb Your Enthusiasm” I wondered what would happen here. Surprisingly, somehow in spite (or perhaps because) of his repellant attitudes, Boris turns out to be hilariously appealing and David allows him just the right amount of humanity at the right moments.

In the opening prologue, Allen uses the stylistic flourish, employed to great effect in Annie Hall, of having Boris talk directly to camera, explaining that he failed at trying to commit suicide. But don’t get turned off thinking you’re in for a soul-searching film. Boris didn’t throw himself out the window from depression, but from his profound realization that eventually everyone gets cancer and dies.

Boris laments most of humanity as nothing more than inchworms, imbeciles and zombie morons (such as the young children to whom he frustratingly and hilariously attempts to teach chess). Then one night fate flings him a curveball in the form of Melodie, a young runaway from Mississippi. Evan Rachel Wood has been an actress worth watching since her breakout performance in 2003’s Thirteen, but I did not recognize her and was surprised to see her listed in the credits. I kept thinking that Amy Adams would have been perfect casting 10 years ago, but it’s a testament to Wood’s performance that she disappeared so deeply I didn’t even recognize her.

From the outset, Boris hurls slings, barbs and insults at Melodie. Despite this she chooses to stay in his apartment while trying to find a job to eventually pay her own way. This presents the makings of a Pygmalion transformation, but Boris even remarks that Melodie is so unfortunately deprived of anything resembling intelligence that such a change would be impossible. Instead, she becomes a kind of parrot of Boris’s opinions on life and the arts, finally dismissing a young man she meets because he and his friends are without culture. Wouldn’t you know it that it’s not long before Boris and Melodie get married? What? The middle-aged man gets to sleep with the young ingénue? In a Woody Allen movie? Never!

Although you can see most of the major plot developments coming from a mile away, I don’t want to reveal too much except to say that Patricia Clarkson turns up halfway through as Melodie’s mother. Clarkson is an actress who injects refreshing maturity into any role she takes on and in a Woody Allen film (often replete with adolescent fantasy) her presence is a breath of fresh air at a point when things are just beginning to get stale.

What follows is an enactment of Allen’s pop-psychology view of what happens when deep-South family values conservatives show up in the big Yankee city. Of course everyone has tremendously good luck in their endeavors (including suicidal vaults out of windows).

Comments

6 Responses to “Movie Review: Whatever Works”

  1. Josh Friedlander
    November 6th, 2009 @

    Not a fan of Match Point?

  2. Jason Ihle
    November 7th, 2009 @

    Well, I did say “mostly forgettable films”.

    Match Point was not nearly as good on a second viewing. I think Jonathan Rhys Myers fails to capture the moral weight of what he’s done, whereas Martin Landau in Crimes and Misdemeanors (which I recently watched) is perfect. Okay, the latter film is meant to be self-reflective and Match Point much less so. Myers is allowed one moment of reflection immediately after the murders. Then it’s back to business as usual.

    Cassandra’s Dream attempts to capture something more akin to Crimes and Misdemeanors, but it felt more like broad comedy at times. Colin Farrell’s performance was a bit to strung out.

    I would say Whatever Works is better than Match Point, but the two films are so different that the comparison is rendered meaningless. I suppose I can say I enjoyed this new one more.

  3. Joel Friedlander
    November 7th, 2009 @

    “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” was a well done film, or so I for one thought. I don’t know how it will hold up during repeat viewings but Penelope Cruz was terrific in her part and I look forward to seeing it again.

  4. Joel Friedlander
    November 20th, 2009 @

    Well, courtesy of my son I was able to see “Whatever Works,” last night. I found it to be a very uneven film, although I thought that it improved as it went along. I will say this, if I was married to the Boris he would only have to throw himself out of a window if the poison I gave him didn’t work.

    What was strange is that the lifestyles portrayed, such as polyandry were creatures of the 1970s and are not apparent now. Also, the Wood character, is a middle/old age fantasy that doesn’t comport with any sense of reality. Patricia Clarkson was wonderful in her role, coming in at a low ebb in the film and revitalizing it.

    All in all however, I felt that the film was a look back on techniques Allen had used in the past. Note too, that he is still too cheap to pay to show an old film on television in his movie. Some things never change.

  5. Jason Ihle
    November 20th, 2009 @

    I agree exactly with what you said about Clarkson’s entrance into the film breathing fresh air into it exactly when it was necessary.

    I don’t really care that he’s too cheap to pay for the rights to show an old film clip. If the addition of the clip adds nothing to the film but an increased budget, then what’s the point, other than for people to be able to watch and have a moment of recognition and nostalgia at seeing something they recognize.

    Interesting you should note the elements that feel like the 1970s, including some of his techniques used. I learned recently that this script was written in the 70s for Zero Mostel and then shelved. When there was an impending actors strike, he pulled this one out for his next quick project.

    Uneven, perhaps, slightly divorced from reality, okay. But I was thoroughly entertained by what I felt was a sharply funny script.

  6. Joel Friedlander
    November 20th, 2009 @

    The Mostel thing makes perfect sense. “The Front,” came out in September, 1976 and Zero Mostel died in September, 2007, which was probably about the time that Allen finished the first rewrite of the script. I can really see Mostel in the part; he had an inherent warmth which would have changed Boris’s persona while using the same script. I wonder who the girl he imagined for the Wood part in the 1970s?

    I also wonder if Allen made any real effort to update the script before he filmed? As it is, I think it would have done better at the theaters if it had been set in the 1970’s.

Leave a Reply





  • Trust us


    As with Anna Karina, we prefer to remember the U.S.A as she was in the 1960s.
  • Archives

  • RSS Matt Friedlander’s Tumblr Feed

  • RSS Josh Friedlander’s Twitter Feed