•
Best journalism web sites
54th Annual Jesse H. Neal National Business Journalism Awards
The winners of the 54th annual Jesse H. Neal awards for editorial excellence in business media were recently announced at The Waldorf-Astoria in New York City.
GreenSource (less than 100K unique visitors/month)
Architectural Record (100K to 500K unique visitors/month)
Computerworld (more than 500K unique visitors/month)
I like the first two, but think computerworld is a bit busy-looking.
Adam: Any idea what back-ends they’re using on these sites? Is it Drupal?
•
8 comments to “Best journalism web sites”
•
19. March 2008 at :
BTW, Adam, looks like they cribbed the Tadias design!
http://www.tadias.com/
19. March 2008 at :
Hey josh…
great to see my work up here (i designed the top two) - it was a great honor to win - also thanks of course to the editorial team…
I’d like to add that archrecord.com was nominated at the end for the grand neal award - against three other print publications… it was the first a website was nominated for best in show… also a huge coup (even if we didn’t win).
19. March 2008 at :
(oh and… who cribbed tadias.com? hope you don’t mean the first two or computer world - i don’t see the resemblance… aside from never having heard of the site)
19. March 2008 at :
That’s hysterical!
yeah…clearly Tadias came afterwards, but I thought I’d stroke the Saunders ego a little bit.
19. March 2008 at :
I don’t know why we haven’t asked for your help with AM before. Your designs are very clean and usable. now that I know, I can see similarities in the first two.
19. March 2008 at :
i think your blog looks good… nice and clean as well.
the idea behind our redesigns right now is to bring all the properties together…
19. March 2008 at :
We are clean, but we have too much good content that disappears once it leaves the front page. It would be awesome to focus on our core areas: politics, food & drink, NYC and get at least 20 headlines above the fold.
21. March 2008 at :
that’s the nature of a blog in general… archiving is so difficult.