<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preaching About Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;Homosexual Agenda&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Criticism in the Service of a Better Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ihle</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-115302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ihle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/#comment-115302</guid>
		<description>People who are so worked up about homosexuals that they repeatedly refer to the gay agenda (a notion with the same insidious implications as the belief in a World Jewish Conspiracy which doesn&#039;t exist - wink, wink, Josh) view homosexuality as a kind of disease that can be spread to children and good Christians. They see it as a choice, and a sinful one at that. It really begs me to ask, if homosexuals chose to be gay when doesn&#039;t that mean everyone else chose to be heterosexual? They see it as something that others will catch if they aren&#039;t careful.

It&#039;s a sick, twisted ideology. But I agree with Josh that it seems very unlikely they&#039;d get anywhere with this plan. Owning a majority share in a company doesn&#039;t mean you can ignore civil rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who are so worked up about homosexuals that they repeatedly refer to the gay agenda (a notion with the same insidious implications as the belief in a World Jewish Conspiracy which doesn&#8217;t exist &#8211; wink, wink, Josh) view homosexuality as a kind of disease that can be spread to children and good Christians. They see it as a choice, and a sinful one at that. It really begs me to ask, if homosexuals chose to be gay when doesn&#8217;t that mean everyone else chose to be heterosexual? They see it as something that others will catch if they aren&#8217;t careful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sick, twisted ideology. But I agree with Josh that it seems very unlikely they&#8217;d get anywhere with this plan. Owning a majority share in a company doesn&#8217;t mean you can ignore civil rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-115224</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/#comment-115224</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s completely absurd. Even if his followers got a hold of a significant percentage of the public equity (the company has a market cap of $322.76 billion), they wouldn&#039;t be able to bully the company, in all probability, without a proxy vote (which it&#039;s likely they&#039;d lose). And say they got someone on the board, for instance...that person would be accountable to shareholders. There&#039;s an argument that these diversity programs help the company. They make it a safe place to work for people who might be ridiculed in other corporate environments. Also, there&#039;s that pesky civil rights legislation to contend with. No matter how many shares purchased, Microsoft can&#039;t actually rail against gay people. The whole idea is absurd. 

I&#039;ve never understood the problem religious conservatives have with homosexuals. They aren&#039;t bothering anybody. They aren&#039;t keeping people poor, or keeping them from having a good meal. They aren&#039;t persecuting people for their religious beliefs. 

Instead of persecuting them, why not take some of that religious firepower and do something to help people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s completely absurd. Even if his followers got a hold of a significant percentage of the public equity (the company has a market cap of $322.76 billion), they wouldn&#8217;t be able to bully the company, in all probability, without a proxy vote (which it&#8217;s likely they&#8217;d lose). And say they got someone on the board, for instance&#8230;that person would be accountable to shareholders. There&#8217;s an argument that these diversity programs help the company. They make it a safe place to work for people who might be ridiculed in other corporate environments. Also, there&#8217;s that pesky civil rights legislation to contend with. No matter how many shares purchased, Microsoft can&#8217;t actually rail against gay people. The whole idea is absurd. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood the problem religious conservatives have with homosexuals. They aren&#8217;t bothering anybody. They aren&#8217;t keeping people poor, or keeping them from having a good meal. They aren&#8217;t persecuting people for their religious beliefs. </p>
<p>Instead of persecuting them, why not take some of that religious firepower and do something to help people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-115219</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanmadness.com/2007/11/21/preaching-about-microsofts-homosexual-agenda/#comment-115219</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Preaching About Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;Homosexual Agenda&#8221;...&lt;/strong&gt;

There is an interesting post over at americanmadness.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Preaching About Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;Homosexual Agenda&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There is an interesting post over at americanmadness.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

