<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Port Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanmadness.com/2006/02/22/port-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2006/02/22/port-security/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Criticism in the Service of a Better Nation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmadness.com/2006/02/22/port-security/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanmadness.com/?p=128#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Port security in general needs to be tightened. A good compromise would be for Congress to find ways to tighten security at our ports while allowing the Dubai deal to go through. But that would require Bush to compromise. This is interesting to watch since Bush is doing such a good job of digging a hole for himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Port security in general needs to be tightened. A good compromise would be for Congress to find ways to tighten security at our ports while allowing the Dubai deal to go through. But that would require Bush to compromise. This is interesting to watch since Bush is doing such a good job of digging a hole for himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
